LOADING

COUNTERTERRORISM SINCE 9/11 Evaluating the Efficacy of Controversial Tactics

By  Nick Adams, Ted Nordhaus and Michael Shellenberger
March 14, 2011

COUNTERTERRORISM SINCE 9/11 Evaluating the Efficacy of Controversial Tactics

Name Format Action
COUNTERTERRORISM SINCE 9/11 Evaluating the Efficacy of Controversial Tactics

Counter Terrorism CVE

In the wake of 9/11, the U.S. government employed several new counterterrorism (CT) tactics, some of which aroused a great deal of controversy. The controversial tactics included ‘enhanced’ interrogation, preventative detention, expanded use of secret surveillance without warrants, ethnic/religious profiling, the collection and mining of domestic data, and the prosecution of terror suspects in military tribunals. While there has been great debate over the morality and legality of these controversial measures, there has been significantly less attention dedicated to evaluating whether the tactics work to prevent terrorism. Even so, people on both sides of the security v. morality/legality debate make assumptions about the efficacy of various CT measures.