LOADING

Securitization, Counterterrorism and the Silencing of Dissent: The Educational Implications of Prevent

By  Aislinn O'Donnell
Dec. 16, 2015

Securitization, Counterterrorism and the Silencing of Dissent: The Educational Implications of Prevent

Name Format Action
Securitization, Counterterrorism and the Silencing of Dissent: The Educational Implications of Prevent

Radicalization Counterterrorism Securitization Education

This essay examines some of the implications of the Prevent legislation in the UK that has made it a statutory duty for a range of institutions and organizations, including educational institutions, to prevent terrorism. It also examines the implications of other elements of counterterrorism legislation for educators. Whilst many organizations had previously engaged with Prevent on a voluntary basis, this new legislation, setting duties on a statutory footing, has significant implications for curricula, freedom of speech, critical enquiry, the pedagogical relationship, the educational experience, and for the integrity of students, teachers and lecturers.